EVALUASI PERATURAN DAERAH KABUPATEN SIDOARJO NOMOR 3 TAHUN 2016

  • Estu Kusumawardani Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur
  • Arimurti Kriswibowo Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur

Abstract

The Sidoarjo Regency Government created Sidoarjo Regency PERDA Number 3 of 2016 concerning the Arrangement and Empowerment of Street Vendors as a response to the proliferation of street vendors. One of the street vendors that is of concern is Gading Fajar street vendors, numbering 1,200 street vendors. This research aims to determine the evaluation of Sidoarjo Regency PERDA Number 3 of 2016 using a qualitative case study method written descriptively. This PERDA evaluation uses the theory of William N. Dunn (2003) which has six criteria, namely effectiveness, efficiency, adequacy, alignment, responsiveness and accuracy. The research results show that based on effectiveness criteria, PERDA is still not effective because the achievement of objectives and involvement of the authorities has not been optimal. However, there is effectiveness in monitoring the arrangement of street vendors by the Sidoarjo Regency Satpol PP. From the efficiency criteria, it shows that the arrangement of street vendors is efficient in terms of time and resources, but not yet efficient in terms of costs. From the adequacy criteria, it shows that the PERDA is not sufficient as a guideline for structuring and empowering street vendors because the Sidoarjo Regency Cooperatives and Micro Enterprises Service has not implemented it optimally so that the Sidoarjo Regency Satpol PP is more dominant in enforcing it themselves. From the leveling criteria, it shows that the distribution of facilities and infrastructure and the distribution of costs is still not evenly distributed, but there is some leveling in socialization by the Sidoarjo Regency Satpol PP. From the responsiveness criteria, it shows that the Sidoarjo Regency Cooperatives and Micro Enterprises Service and the Sidoarjo Regency Satpol PP received various responses of acceptance and rejection but they were able to overcome them and Gading Fajar Street Vendors continue to wait for empowerment from the authorities. From the accuracy criteria, it shows that the accuracy of objectives and benefits are still not balanced because its implementation in Gading Fajar is still focused on structuring and has not yet led to empowerment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Keywords: Public Policy, Policy Evaluation, Street Vendors

References

Abdal. (2015). Kebijakan Publik (Memahami Konsep Kebijakan Publik). Bandung : LPPM UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Akbar, F., & Mohi, W. K. (2018). Studi Evaluasi Kebijakan (Evaluasi Beberapa Kebijakan di Indonesia). Gorontalo : Ideas Publishing

Alamsyah, K. (2016). Kebijakan Publik Konsep dan Aplikasi. Bandung : Media Citra Mandiri Press

Anggara, S. (2014). Kebijakan Publik. Bandung : Pustaka Setia Bandung

Aslinda. (2023). Model Kebijakan Publik dan Teori Perubahan Kebijakan. Yogyakarta : K-Media

Dewi, D. S. K. (2022). Buku Ajar Kebijakan Publik : Proses, Implementasi dan Evaluasi. Yogyakarta : Penerbit Samudra Biru

Dunn, W. (2003). Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Publik Edisi Kedua. Yogyakarta : Gadjah Mada University Press

Indiati. (2021). Buku Ajar Pengantar Kebijakan Publik. Malang : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Waskita Dharma Malang

Marhawati. (2020). Analisis Pendapatan Pedagang Kaki Lima Sektor Informal di Kecamatan Rappocini Kota Makassar. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Pendidikan, 3(1), 68–76. https://doi.org/10.26858/jekpend.v3i1.12374

Meutia, I. F. (2013). Analisis Kebijakan Publik. Bandar Lampung : Aura CV. Anugrah Utama Raharja

Mustari, N. (2015). Pemahaman Kebijakan Publik (Formulasi, Implementasi dan Evaluasi Kebijakan Publik). Yogyakarta : Leutikaprio

Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 41 Tahun 2012 Tentang Pedoman Penataan Dan Pemberdayaan Pedagang Kaki Lima

Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Sidoarjo Nomor 3 Tahun 2016 Tentang Penataan Dan Pemberdayaan Pedagang Kaki Lima

Pramono, J. (2020). Implementasi dan Evaluasi Kebijakan Publik. Surakarta : Unisri Press

Pratiwi, D. C., & Kriswibowo, A. (2022). Implementasi Peraturan Menteri Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak Nomor 11 Tahun 2011 Tentang Kebijakan Pengembangan Kabupaten/Kota Layak Anak di Surabaya. Populis : Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora, 7(2), 192. https://doi.org/10.47313/pjsh.v7i2.1867

Rahayu, M. J., Werdiningtyas, R., & Musyawaroh. (2016). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Keberhasilan Penataan PKL Sebagai Strategi Penataan Ruang Kota Surakarta. Jurnal Region, 7(2), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.20961/region.v7i2.11582

Ravyansyah, Purba, S., Irawan, B., Fathur, A., Purnama, E., Wiwin, K., Sudiartini, N. W. A., Haris, A., Suwardi, A, M. D. S., & Sari, D. (2022). Kebijakan Publik. Padang : PT. Global Eksekutif Teknologi

Sawir, M. (2021). Ilmu Administrasi Dan Analisis Kebijakan Publik Konseptual Dan Praktik. Yogyakarta : Deepublish Publisher

Sulistyo, T. P., & Kriswibowo, A. (2023). Policy Output Analysis dalam Penanganan Kekerasan Terhadap Anak di Dinas DP2KBP2 Kabupaten Mojokerto. 4(2), 481–493.

Tahir, A. (2018). Kebijakan Publik Dan Good Governancy. Gorontalo : Alfabeta

Tarmudzi, I. (2015). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pekerja Anak Di Sektor Informal. Al-Jinayah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam, 1(2), 499–527. https://doi.org/10.15642/aj.2015.1.2.383-398

Taufiqurokhman. (2014). Kebijakan Publik Pendelegasian Tanggung Jawab Negara Kepada Presiden Selaku Penyelenggara Pemerintahan. Jakarta : Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Moestopo Beragama Pers

Yusuf, M. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif & Penelitian Gabungan. Padang : Kencana

Published
2024-01-30
Section
Articles
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)
Abstract views: 174
downloads: 135